I’ve started a new thread in regards to your comments since I am not going to allow you to hijack a thread where I am trying to make a difference.
Personally, I think you need a lesson in blogging etiquette. I took the time to read all the postings from your short existence here on Dealer Elite and I found most of your material to be self promotional or insulting to other people who work in our industry. You often use the term “Moronic” and “Neanderthal” when referring to people who work in our business. Do you actually think that by insulting potential clients you'll earn their business?
You are quick to criticize others, but do not take the time to offer how you would accomplish whatever it is you teach. While you may not agree with what I teach, that does not give you the right to come on here and insult me? You might as well have just walked in to one of my on-site training sessions and proclaimed me a charlatan, because that’s basically what you just did in my phone training thread. Did you used to get beat up a lot as a kid in school and now you find satisfaction in using a keyboard to insult others? You’ve picked a fight with the wrong person amigo.
The materials I teach are proven to work and I have quite a few satisfied customers who can back that up. Many well know trainers in the business teach techniques very similar to the ones I teach. So not only are you insulting me, but you’re also insulting countless others. If something has been around for 30 years, it’s probably because it works.
I have personally taken countless phone-ups as well as listened to thousands upon thousands of phone-ups through many of the call tracking services used by automotive dealerships. My team and I listen to and coach roughly 400 to 600 phone-ups per month. I have been teaching this material for the better part of the last ten years. Before that I was a very successful salesperson and manager working in a dealership, so I think I know a thing or two about how to handle a phone-up. Not only do I truly believe in what I teach, but I’ll also get on the phone while in a dealership and schedule appointment after appointment.
Since you’re a self proclaimed expert on how to handle customers, one would think you would know better than to come on here and make derogatory remarks about another trainer. Do you teach your students to bash the competition?
Now on to your lesson in blogging etiquette:
There’s enough business out there to support hundreds of trainers. We don’t need to be on here bashing one another in an attempt to earn business. I truly do not like writing this type of message, but you left me no choice when you made derogatory remarks about me and my business. And for the record, my business employs five very professional and intelligent women who coach salespeople on how to appoint more phone-ups, and my clients love what they do.
So I encourage you to think twice before hitting the submit button next time you feel the need say something negative.
Tags:
1. You coached the sales person to tell the prospect “we’ve had a few calls already on that one today.” That is, in all likelihood, a lie. A big lie? No, but a lie nevertheless. Where does a habit of lying start? With the first little lie.
2. You coached the sales person “go for the contact info first,” by using the thoroughly Neanderthal strategy of faking a reason to necessitate a call back; “are you calling from home or work?” The customer calls seeking information; the methodology you teach reverses the process and has the sales person sucking information out of the customer. Reverse psychology? No, just rude and ineffective.
3. You coached the sales person to fake a discussion with their manager; “hold on, there’s my manager, let me check the vehicle’s availability.” Do prospective customers like being put on hold? Do you?
4. You coached the sales person to “deflect” the caller’s questions. If you call a business seeking information and the person on the other end of the phone “deflects” your questions; does that cause you to warm up to them?
5. You coached the sales person to say; “I’m not sure about the price, we just took it in, but we sell more used BMW’s than anybody.” Classic evasive tactic, 40 year-old sales technology and in
6. I’m coachable, instead of putting this DE, I sent it to you.
As for what I teach; I don’t “claim it’s the best.” I let the sales team members and customers judge that for themselves. I didn’t develop what I teach, Tom Watson did. He proved to me 10 years ago that what you (and I) had been taught about handling incoming phone calls was patently wrong. What I now teach is really short, really simple, and based on just a couple of principles; answer the prospective customer’s questions as honestly as you are able, then guide the prospective customer to suggest an appointment. The tactics employed include telling the truth and treating the prospective customer politely and with respect. It’s not the name and number that’s MOST important; it’s the appointment. Using a strategy that has the customer suggesting the appointment pretty much nets you the “name and number.” Answering the customer’s questions is polite. Exhibiting respect for the person with the money is considered a wise move by most people who understand selling. Lying, interrupting, deflecting, and putting people unnecessarily on hold doesn’t pass the “Polite and Respectful” test.
Wow,
I can't believe I am just seeing this now... Interesting stuff!
I happen to love a great debate.
If negative statements were avoided at all costs it results in no debate. What is the Ben Franklin close about but positives and negatives?
If no one ever posted a negative (opposing) statement or always abstained from commenting if they didn't agree, then we all would be just a bunch of "yes men" and have what we do here, frequently, discussions with little to no comment. Frankly I think we have been done a great service by virtue of this thread. Ideally people will see that a good spirited debate stirs up interest and hopefully participation.
Great lessons are learned and discoveries made because someone at some point opposes the staus quo.
To use a baseball analogy I think most all the people on here have a pretty good batting average. The secret is finding that "sweet spot" on the bat to maximize every hit.
Good post Stan.
The basic principle of debate is "let's agree to disagree".
Stan Sher said:
Everyone thinks their methods are the best. In reality, it is all just the opinion of what we automotive professionals think sounds right. I believe everyone has something that we can learn from. Jerry does an awesome job with his training. I may not agree with everything 100% but I am pretty close. I am a huge supporter of his and a fan of his work. That being said, I also like a lot of other training that I have experienced. I learned a lot and still continue to learn. We should just respect each other and the work that we provide to help the industry succeed. No one is perfect and no one method is the best out there. Let's practice having an open mind.
I thought this thread was destined for the shelves when Steve never replied to my rebuttal. That normally happens when one has been defeated.
I am not one to be negative or confrontational, but when verbally attacked or provoked, I'll stand up for what I believe in each and every time.
© 2024 Created by DealerELITE. Powered by