In my experience, one of the top frustrations dealers have when choosing the best solutions from multiple vendors is how to get them to work well together. The problem is, whether it’s a DMS; CRM; service lane tool; or any other significant technology available; not all work together in harmony. And that is what dealers want.
I’m not suggesting that everyone sit in a circle and sing "Kumbaya," but just that when a dealer finds a solution which promises to increase sales or CSI, they really wish that all their other technology partners would play nice.
Is the vendor community afraid of ‘partnership’? Why is there a problem providing dealers with choices as far as what works best for THEM, rather than the vendor?
Here’s how I see it:
While understandable, this roadblock for the start-up can also end up being a retention issue for the larger technology vendor, if the dealer(s) want the service badly enough. Many dealers change technology providers merely because they want solutions to work together. If their vendor is unwilling, they go and find others that are.
In the end, the goal for any dealer technology provider should be to make things easier and more profitable for their dealers. The best way to do that is for everyone to work together to benefit BOTH dealers and the industry in general. Technology companies will continue to innovate, and DMS providers should welcome that. Those that make integration difficult, or just refuse, will find themselves losing clients.
© 2025 Created by DealerELITE.
Powered by
You need to be a member of DealerELITE.net to add comments!
Join DealerELITE.net