According to media accounts, one of the dealers cited in the most recent action stated "Was it fair? Absolutely not. The reason we settled it was because it was less expensive than to go to court."
Well, as we parents are so fond of telling our children: "Life isn't fair..."
This dealer and his legal counsel apparently feel that the FTC has not been clear in delineating their expectations regarding compliant advertising. Perhaps that's true, but after attending the FTC's dealer advertising press conference this past March, I'm not sure I completely agree. As I outlined in the post Key Takeaways from the FTC's Dealer Advertising Webinar, it seems to me that the FTC has been pretty forthcoming about their perspectives regarding proper advertising.
I've said it many times before and I'll say it once again: If you’re not sure that your advertising is compliant, don’t guess! It makes sense to have your advertisements reviewed, and edited if necessary, by someone knowledgeable before publication. It may cost a few bucks, but it’s a small price to pay.
$360,000 (plus legal fees) and bad press seems like a really high price to pay for guessing wrong.
You need to be a member of DealerELITE.net to add comments!
Join DealerELITE.net