Jim Ziegler asks...
I am hearing a lot of discussion about True Car and ZAG. I continually scratch my head and wonder if desperate dealers are doing the marketing limbo "How Low Can You Go?"
Are we so bad at what we do that we have to line up and pay vendors to lose money? AND, who is giving these people access to your data that is used against you?
Who owns these companies and what might be their ulterior motive? Sometimes I ask questions to which I already know the answer.
Am I wrong?
What do you think... JIM
Jim Ziegler's Guidance and Recommended Action Plan:
Ten Areas We Need to Concentrate on to Bring This Monster to It's Knees...
Read this article as a reference: http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=%2F20110831%2FFIN...
AND, if you doubt the mission... read this... http://www.zag.com/websiteASSETS/whitepapers/ZAG-WhitePaper3.pdf
Comment
WOW! This could be the beginning of something huge in the Data Wars
http://www.fi-magazine.com/News/Story/2012/02/Obama-Unveils-Online-...
My friend, Jason Manning posted this elsewhere. I think it's worthy of reposting here....
"I've said it before: vendors have had their run. Now, dealers are gaining intelligence and turning another corner. Best of luck, if you are a vendor who exploited contracts over the last 7-8 years to pilfer dealer data for your own company's research and development, into a new consumer product or site. The puzzle pieces are coming together. Will you be distrusted like TrueCar? Good riddance! If you're not with us, you are precisely against us. TrueCar has become the business model of what NOT to do to a dealer and there will be many more to join them. Don't go away mad. Just go away. You'll change or we will show the door. We are securing our data and future. Don't take it personally if your consumer product fails or stalls, due to our future changes in our approach to your contracts. Don't get bent if we require TRUST to be the underlying theme..."
@ Heather. Tomorrow, February 29th, all Maryland dealers that are currently active or inactive on the TRUECar program will be receiving an "ALL CLEAR" communication and specific details on how TC will be operating in the state. This will include regulatory compliance, OEM compliance, a more "dealer friendly" agreement and more clarity on how TC uses the data it receives. Thanks for your patience.
In spite of Mike's great demeanor and personality...He still works for Truecar, never lose sight of that. AND TrueCar is NOT the dealers' friend in any way.
I am now focusing on larger issues. Although I can't tell you everything yet, I am meeting some key groups who are interested in hearing about Data and Truecar and Data-pirates in general. Some discussions with National Dealer Councils of major manufacturers. Although the majority of the discussion will center around TrueCar and their hostile business model, we are also focusing on a much larger Data-Killing initiative at a national level in our industry.
As I have told a number of people of interest,the battle is much larger than just TrueCar.
In recent weeks I have been contacted by several of the largest Data-Aggregators in the industry and we have meetings in coming weeks at their request. If I said I have had conversations with half a dozen large vendors at their request, that would be accurate.
I question I think needs to be investigated by government agencies is this... "I wonder if USAA is sharing any of their customer data on military and government employees and retirees financial information with TrueCar?
When we finally educate the public that TrueCar and companies like TrueCar are extracting their personal data from the dealers' computers, maybe we can create an atmosphere restoring the trust that Scott painter and people like him (Edmunds, CarFax, etc.) have systematically torn down perpetuating fear and stereotypes.
TrueCar is as evil and anti-dealer as ever, Scott Painter is touring around the country still promoting the same arrogant, superior anti-dealer rhetoric and diagrams the same anti-dealer business plan as he attempts to work the public against auto dealers. Nobody likes him or trusts this guy or believes anything he says.
@ Thomas: Jim is really the guy who has pushed very hard and brought this issue to light. I rallied behind the wrongness of re-purposing the data against the dealer and the amazing way that CEO Scott Painter talked badly about the dealers. I **WANT** modernization of dealers because they won't survive without it; I just didn't think a cataclysmic approach was warranted.
@ Jim: I hope those companies contacting you are on the dealers' side, regardless of what they do or don't do with data. I'm very interested in any updates that come from the meetings you mentioned. Thank you!
Thanks Keith and James...Your time and hard work is appreciated fellas.
Keith, I strongly agree. Mike has been sending out a lot of form messages to car people, I have several on LinkedIn and other mediums he sent to car people that are nearly identically worded. He's a great ambassador for a bad company.
You would be amazed how many vendors have contacted me in recent weeks to discuss what they do (or claim they do not do) with consumer data they extract from Dealers' DMS systems.
I have several meetings with Dealer Groups on the subject scheduled and manufacturers. Although TrueCar will be a large part of my onstage presentation, the larger issue of Data-Piracy is in the forefront of the events.
@ Heather: Mike's a very like-able (car) guy at a very unlike-able (un-car) company. I focused on how NON-dealer-centric TC has been and the non-dealer-centric future that Scott Painter, er, "painted". And how, though dealers pay TC's bill, that TC, in my opinion, forgot (if they ever knew) who their real customer was (NOT the consumer). I think TC feels singled out versus other lead models, but I told him it wasn't the same when a company such as TC ran around publicly pushing with the anti-dealer message from the top. Regardless, data--more importantly the USE of data--by any vendor is now the issue, imho.
And I think that part is just about to get VERY, VERY ugly across the industry, and if TC were starting today perhaps guys like Mike would've been able to get TC on the right side--the DEALERS' side--of data use out of the gate. $200million and a data center from Star Trek aimed in a dealer-centric fashion would've been very powerful.
As it stands, I don't know if any current lead vendors can overcome the natural schizophrenia of presenting a strong consumer face but getting paid by the dealer. That has been tolerated for a long time, and I think that age is coming to an end. I shared that viewpoint with Mike, too.
Any nuggets you can share Keith?
We have been awaiting the 'revised' Maryland dealer agreement (since proposed launch date of Feb 8th) - but have yet to see it. I'm guessing that they are running into many different hurdles as they try to revamp/restructure their offerings.
37,469 views is the Most Viewed Blog Ever on dE! Is this a World record for an Automotive Social site?
© 2024 Created by DealerELITE. Powered by
You need to be a member of DealerELITE.net to add comments!
Join DealerELITE.net