Jim Ziegler asks...
I am hearing a lot of discussion about True Car and ZAG. I continually scratch my head and wonder if desperate dealers are doing the marketing limbo "How Low Can You Go?"
Are we so bad at what we do that we have to line up and pay vendors to lose money? AND, who is giving these people access to your data that is used against you?
Who owns these companies and what might be their ulterior motive? Sometimes I ask questions to which I already know the answer.
Am I wrong?
What do you think... JIM
Jim Ziegler's Guidance and Recommended Action Plan:
Ten Areas We Need to Concentrate on to Bring This Monster to It's Knees...
Read this article as a reference: http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=%2F20110831%2FFIN...
AND, if you doubt the mission... read this... http://www.zag.com/websiteASSETS/whitepapers/ZAG-WhitePaper3.pdf
Comment
Keith, don't expect NADA to get involved. They cite Federal Anti-Trust laws and Restraint of Trade violations as the main thing holding them back.
Personally, I don't see why they don't address "Data Issues" without targeting a specific company.
@ Thomas: I wish it would be NADA. Maybe Jim can check if that's possible.
@ Keith, What would it take to get NADA to undertake creating "universal language" that would safeguard consumers and dealers? Individual states could then tweak it?...or perhaps someone other than NADA?
1) We need a "standard use restriction" clause that over-rides all existing agreements with a vendor. IOW, we need something crafted by a lawyer. And this can be an addendum to an existing agreement, but it needs to be put in EVERY vendor agreement when that agreement concerns the vendor data. Legal remedy . . . that all exposure goes back to the vendor if terms violated? Monetary penalties?
2) We need a way to have vendors commit, publicly, to this strategy. A "Safe Data Vendor" list, if you will.
3) We need to educate dealers that NOBODY gets into the DMS or the CRM without # 1 and #2.
I think that's a start.
Okay, asking all on the blog ... let's get specifics rolling here. Beginning with TrueCar, what specifically do we need to do next as far as getting the dealers educated?
What language do we need to get them negotiate?
What legal remedies?
TC's income stream is not just dependent on dealers. They receive income on the mountains of information that they publish daily. Why should a dealer give one scrap of information to them to reuse in ANY way?....Are they supporting their claim to be the "authority" on everything automotive using data that has nothing to do with a dealers interest?....Again, why give them ANYTHING if you are paying a subscription fee?
@ Larry is correct. The first step is to correct the agreements. It's not as easy to get the dealers to pursue restricting the data fields if they don't have an actionable agreement to guide that restrictions.
@David
I understand data sharing agreements won't completely stop it, but we have to start somewhere and it will slow it down.
Great posts guys, Larry, David and Jay... Thomas. The Data Wars are on and we must keep educating dealers and associations. I am firmly convinced that Truecar has NOT changed their business plan...they are just looking at this as a delay before they bring it back. That is what I heard in Painter's interview. These people are as dedicated as ever to their original plan.
The issue still remains...why do they need access to the dealers' DMS Computers? Why do they still doggedly insist on extracting identifiable consumer information? The answer is obvious...they are just laying low until they perceive it's time to come back out. JIM
AMEN Mike!
All dealers that are reading this post you MUST get your own data sharing agreement. You MUST make the ALL vendors understand that that agreement covers any data you send to them, DMS, Inventory, Website Behavioral data, CRM data, ILM data... Basically if it goes out of my store this agreement covers it. DEALERS ITS NOT JUST YOUR DMS DATA THAT IS BEING SOLD AND RE-PURPOSED! You MUST make the vendor understand that agreement supersedes all other language written or implied. You MUST ask an executive of the vendors company to sign that agreement AND You MUST ask them to get an executive at what ever polling company they use, DMI, Authenticom, RCI, Homenet etc to sign that agreement as well. You MUSTseed ALL your data DMS, CRM, Website data to check and make sure your data is not being sold off.
If they will not comply you have a choice to make, but make it with all the facts.
© 2024 Created by DealerELITE. Powered by
You need to be a member of DealerELITE.net to add comments!
Join DealerELITE.net