Jim Ziegler asks...
I am hearing a lot of discussion about True Car and ZAG. I continually scratch my head and wonder if desperate dealers are doing the marketing limbo "How Low Can You Go?"
Are we so bad at what we do that we have to line up and pay vendors to lose money? AND, who is giving these people access to your data that is used against you?
Who owns these companies and what might be their ulterior motive? Sometimes I ask questions to which I already know the answer.
Am I wrong?
What do you think... JIM
Jim Ziegler's Guidance and Recommended Action Plan:
Ten Areas We Need to Concentrate on to Bring This Monster to It's Knees...
Read this article as a reference: http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=%2F20110831%2FFIN...
AND, if you doubt the mission... read this... http://www.zag.com/websiteASSETS/whitepapers/ZAG-WhitePaper3.pdf
Comment
Jim, I think that is great news.... You are right they are huge and influential.
http://www.prlog.org/11762574-atlantic-automotive-group-announces-a...
These guys are one of the largest, most influential dealer groups in New York..
@ Chad: Yes, it is not the DMS. The term "DMS" is used 26 times in the patent, however.
In stead of using the company name (TC), I would suggest simply referring to them as the "beast."
The beast is going to dominate SEO as they grow. Dealers are inadvertently helping build their largest competitor. It saddens me that some dealers are taking a wait and see approach before canceling. Others will end up jumping on the Beast since the competition is there. Once that happens it gets even uglier for dealers.
Maybe the difference for all of this data is in those TrueCar patent applications? The one filed from 2008 and granted this past May 2011, #7,945,483, "System and method for sales generation in conjunction with a vehicle data system" talking about that up-front price and all. Painter's on that one, assignee TrueCar, and it's an interesting read (though long as patents tend to be). The graphics were interesting. That first patent . . . the "quality score" for a dealer . . . well, that wouldn't be one of the reasons to look at the dealer's DMS information, would it? Is that the "Vehicle Data System" from the title? I asked for some clarification; we'll see if I get it.
Then there's #7,945,500 and #8,065,218 having to do with "System and method for providing an insurance premium for price protection", assignee PriceLock (from Painter), which talks about insurance as a commodity . . . there's that pesky word again. Next stop on the Painter Commodity Train, insurance!
Here's that "Vehicle Data System" patent, for those who want a read: http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITO...
For all here: You can search the insurance items if you want from the search screens of the US Patent and Trademark office: http://patft.uspto.gov/
Thanks!
@ Eric, please put the screen snaps into the posts here for all to see. And also email them to me as before, if you can. I won't get the same search results from here as you do, especially for PPC. Thanks!
I was just called and informed by an insider that some "Lead Providers" are buying leads from TrueCar that are inadvertently being sold to GM and given to GM dealers. OKAY, that is exactly my point, customer information being passed around from vendor to vendor and now back to the manufacturer....it's out of control.
WHOA...I am receiving dozens of emails already about this... My latest article in Wards Dealer Business, read it here... http://wardsdealer.com/latest/1230jz_Ziegler_column/
© 2024 Created by DealerELITE. Powered by
You need to be a member of DealerELITE.net to add comments!
Join DealerELITE.net